Using GoPros to Step into the Shoes of an Offender, a Victim or a Bystander
Cluster Technological innovations in criminological research (CRIME Lab) is currently working on the validation of an alternative hypothetical scenario method. Instead of using the common written scenarios we take a visual turn and use filmed criminal scenarios shot from the viewpoint of the perceiver. This way we are able to put the viewer in the shoes of an offender, a victim, or a bystander to examine how (s)he would react in criminogenic situations.
Scenarios are short descriptions of situations in which a choice can be made. A reader is asked to imagine him- or herself to be in the situation and to subsequently answer a number of questions pertaining to it. These questions regard how (s)he perceives the situation and whether (s)he would make a choice if (s)he would be in it. The scenario method is a highly prevalent method in criminology, especially in the context of offender decision making, and is also often used in other social sciences. But, like all research methods, this particular method also has its share of limitations.
For one thing, the scenario method relies on the ability of participants to imagine themselves in a hypothetical situation. As such, it may actually measure participants’ ability to identify with a situation and their imaginative capabilities rather than reflect actual choice preferences. Furthermore, people are likely to differ in how they imagine a specific described situation, which can add more unwanted ‘noise’. The scenario method is also unable to capture a decision maker’s physiological and psychological reactions to the situation. With these limitations in mind, we set out to develop and test an alternative approach using visual scenarios and GoPro point of view (POV) cameras.
We recorded the same criminal event (the theft of a €50 note) from three different perspectives: the offender, the victim and a bystander using POV cameras. Participants in our research see the event (or read about the event) from one of these three perspectives and are subsequently asked how they evaluate the situation and how they would react to it. The aim of the project is to gain a deeper understanding into decision-making processes and how the visual approach compares to the traditional scenario method in terms of reliability and validity. Do people respond differently to the visual compared to the written situation? Does the visual method elicit stronger emotional reactions? Do they experience higher presence and realism? Furthermore, the Visualising Crime Project is also intended to address substantive research questions, such as whether people desire stronger punishment of an offender, and compensation for a victim, when they see a video recording versus a written description of a criminal incident. Or how people’s personality traits relate to offending, guardianship and victimisation.
The Visualising Crime stimulus set developed by NSCR’s CRIME Lab consists of visual and identical written versions of three different criminal events, each from the perspective of either an offender, a victim or a bystander. The stimulus set (in Dutch) is available for use by external researchers. For more information about the project or conditions for use, send an email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Credits picture: Shutterstock
- Jean-Louis van Gelder receives Vidi grant - May 30, 2017
- Visualising Crime Project - September 8, 2016
- Virtual burglary project - January 20, 2016
- Innovative Data Collection Methods in Crime Research - May 13, 2015
- Visualisation of future self reduces criminal behaviour - May 8, 2014
Raad voor de Rechtspraak 2017.
Rekenkameronderzoek Nazorg: Terugkeer van ex-gedetineerden in de Amersfoortse samenleving Technical Report
Rekenkamer Amersfoort 2017.
The growth of randomized experiments in policing. The vital few and the salience of mentoring Journal Article
Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10 (1), pp. jan-28, 2013.