Who bothers to report cybercrime?

Despite the considerable rise in the number of victims of cybercrime in recent decades, these offences are rarely reported to the police. NSCR researchers Steve van de Weijer, Rutger Leukfeldt and Wim Bernasco investigated which characteristics of victims are predictors of whether a person will report a cybercrime or not. 

For this research, they used data from the Veiligheidsmonitor over a period of four years (2012-2015). A total of 127,413 offences were investigated, and it was ascertained whether the victims of the offences reported this to the police. More than 36,000 offences were forms of cybercrime, such as identity theft, consumer fraud or hacking. The remainder were forms of traditional crime, such as theft, vandalism or violence.

Reporting rate considerably lower for cybercrimes

The results revealed that 37.5% of offences were reported to the police but that this percentage was considerably lower for cybercrimes: identity theft (26.3%), consumer fraud (24.0%) and hacking (7.1%). However, a large proportion of the victims of identity theft (82.3%) did report the offence to another organisation, such as the bank.

Victim characteristics differ between cybercrime and traditional crime

Characteristics of victims who did report an offence were also found to differ between victims of cybercrime and victims of traditional crime. For example, men and people of non-Western ethnicity reported cybercrime more often, whereas women went to the police more often after a traditional offence.

Reporting to consumer organisations

Neighbourhood characteristics were not found to influence the choice of victims of cybercrime to go to the police. This is in contrast to victims of traditional crime who report this more often to the police if they live in a safe neighbourhood with little nuisance. Another striking result is that people who have previously been a victim of cybercrime report the offence more often to consumer organisations and banks, for example, and less often to the police.

Publication details and further reading

Van de Weijer, S.G.A., Leukfeldt, R., Bernasco, W. (2018) Determinants of reporting cybercrime: A comparison between identity theft, consumer fraud, and hackingEuropean Journal of Criminology.

Steve van de Weijer and Rutger Leukfeldt, together with Sophie van der Zee (Erasmus University Rotterdam), are currently working on a follow-up study for
Politie en Wetenschap (Police and Science) in which they are also investigating victims’ motives to report or not to report an offence.

About dr. Steve van de Weijer

Steve van de Weijer is postdoc researcher at the NSCR since September 2014. In March 2014 he defended his thesis on the intergenerational transmission of violent delinquency. His research focuses on life-course criminology, criminal careers and the inter- and intra- generational transmission of crime.

Steve is a member of the Life-course Cluster, the Intergenerational Cluster and the Sanctions Cluster.

See full curriculum vitae Dr Steve van de Weijer.

View All Posts


de Keijser, J W; Elffers, H; Kok, R M; Sjerps, M J

Bijkans begrepen? : Feitelijk en vermeend begrip van forensische deskundigenrapportages onder rechters, advocaten en deskundigen. Book

Boom Juridische Uitgevers, 2009.



Broeders, A P A; Kloosterman, A D; Sjerps, M J

Een gevaarlijke tak van sport : Reactie van het NFI op 'De mythe van het DNA-bewijs' Journal Article

Advocatenblad, 86 , pp. 697-700, 2006.